Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court correctly permitted testimony regarding statements made by the complainant after being shot, in which he identified the defendant as his assailant, and indicated that the gun found underneath his body belonged to the defendant. The statements were made within minutes after the complainant was shot six times. The circumstances surrounding the making of
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.