1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 119 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 119 Cal.Rptr.2d 614 (2002)
 

KOLLANDER CONST., INC. v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. B155620.

119 Cal.Rptr.2d 614 (2002)

98 Cal.App.4th 304

KOLLANDER CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent, Dionicia Alvarez, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

May 8, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benjamin L. Crumpacker and Howard E. Hamann, for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Mayra M. Fornos, Culver City; Esner & Chang, Los Angeles, Andrew N. Chang, Oakland, and Stuart B. Esner, Los Angeles, for Real Party in Interest.

HASTINGS, J.

We issued an Order to Show Cause in this original proceeding and requested briefing on whether Code of Civil Procedure section 1008 is unconstitutional to the extent that it purports to deprive trial courts of their inherent power to reconsider interim rulings.1 We agree with Division Seven of this District which held in Darling, Hall & Rae v. Kritt (1999)

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases