1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 198 F.Supp.2d
  5. 198 F.Supp.2d 530 (2002)
 

CHUM LIMITED v. LISOWSKI

No. 98 Civ. 5060(CBM).

198 F.Supp.2d 530 (2002)

CHUM LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. Adam LISOWSKI et al., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

April 18, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth A. Plevan, Bruce J. Goldner, Steyen M. Rosenthal, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP, New York City, for plaintiff.

Raymond J. Dowd, New York City, Jason E. Bogli, Dowd & Marotta, LLC, Brooklyn, NY, for defendants.

OPINION

MOTLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff Chum Limited ("Chum") uses "Fashion Television" and other similar marks in connection with its weekly television program featuring stories related to fashion. Defendant Adam Lisowski ("Lisowski") together with certain companies he owns and controls (collectively "defendants") use "Fashion TV" and other similar marks in connection with their 24-hour cable television channel devoted to fashion. Chum brought...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases