1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 148 Ohio
  5. 148 Ohio App.3d 578 (2002)
 

STATE v. REYNOLDS

No. 19084.

148 Ohio App.3d 578 (2002)

2002-Ohio-3811

The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. REYNOLDS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, Montgomery County.

Decided July 26, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mathias H. Heck, Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, Kirsten A. Brandt, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Christopher B. Epley, for appellant.

FAIN, Judge.

{¶ 1} Appellant Billy Ray Reynolds appeals from his conviction and sentence for abusing harmful intoxicants, in violation of R.C. 2925.31. He contends that R.C. 2925.31 is unconstitutional because the statute is vague and overbroad, failing to clearly delineate what types of conduct will lead to criminal prosecution. He also argues that his conviction is not supported by sufficient evidence and is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases