CARGILL, INC. v. EVANSTON INS. CO.

No. C1-01-1589.

642 N.W.2d 80 (2002)

CARGILL, INCORPORATED, Appellant, v. EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 16, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas C. Mielenhausen, Christopher L. Lynch, Lindquist & Vennum, P.L.L.P., St. Paul, for appellant.

Richard P. Mahoney, Victor E. Lund, Mahoney, Dougherty and Mahoney, P.A., Minneapolis, and Jonathan S. Reed, Adam D. Krauss, Traub Eglin Lieberman Straus, Edison, NJ, pro hac vice for respondent.

Considered and decided by RANDALL, Presiding Judge, KLAPHAKE, Judge, and DORIS OHLSEN HUSPENI, Judge.


OPINION

DORIS OHLSEN HUSPENI, Judge.*

Appellant insured seeks reversal of summary judgment awarded to respondent insurer, and argues that the district court erred in determining that (1) a claim was not made by appellant according to the terms of the insurance policy, (2) notice of the claim was not properly given to respondent by appellant, (3) the other-insurance clause in the policy prevents appellant from qualifying for coverage...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases