Ordered that the judgment and amended judgment are affirmed.
The defendant contends that the Supreme Court erroneously permitted the prosecutor to cross-examine two defense witnesses about their failure to inform the police or the District Attorney's office, prior to trial, of their account of the robbery. The defendant's contention is without merit. The prosecutor laid the proper foundation pursuant to People v Dawson (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.