Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the petitioners' motion to extend the time in which to serve the respondents pursuant to CPLR 306-b in the interest of justice, despite the expiration of the statute of limitations. The record demonstrates a lack of diligence in effecting service and the failure to demonstrate the existence of a meritorious claim (see Leader v Maroney, Ponzini &...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.