1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 117 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 117 Cal.Rptr.2d 582 (2002)
 

CITY OF REDLANDS v. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

Nos. E028515, E028540.

117 Cal.Rptr.2d 582 (2002)

96 Cal.App.4th 398

CITY OF REDLANDS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO et al., Defendants and Appellants. City of Rancho Cucamonga, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. County of San Bernardino et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

As Modified February 22, 2002.

Review Denied May 15, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan K. Marks, County Counsel, and Robin Cochran, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Appellants.

James L. Markman, Brea; Richards, Watson & Gershon and Rochelle Browne, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Respondent City of Rancho Cucamonga.

Daniel J. McHugh, Redlands, and Leslie E. Murad, II, Riverside, for Plaintiff and Respondent City of Redlands.

OPINION

GAUT, J.

1. Introduction

The County of San Bernardino (the County) approved amendments that modified its general plan relating to land use regulation of unincorporated territory located within a city's "sphere of influence." In connection with the approval of these amendments, the County also adopted a negative declaration under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases