STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Christopher D. ANSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Oral argument August 22, 2002.
Decided October 9, 2002.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
On behalf of the defendant-appellant, there were briefs and oral argument by Steven J. Watson of Steven J. Watson Law Office of Elkhorn.
On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and David H. Perlman, assistant attorney general. There was oral argument by David H. Perlman.
Before Brown, Anderson and Snyder, JJ.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
¶ 1. BROWN, J.
In Patterson v. Illinois,487 U.S. 285, 292 (1988), the United States Supreme Court observed that a waiver of a Sixth Amendment right to counsel is valid only when it reflects "an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege." The Court held that since Patterson had been informed that he had been indicted and had been given his Fifth Amendment...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.