1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 644 N.W.2d
  5. 644 N.W.2d 44 (2002)
 

IN RE APPORTIONMENT OF TUSCOLA CTY. BD. OF COM'RS

Docket No. 120250.

644 N.W.2d 44 (2002)

466 Mich. 78

In re APPORTIONMENT OF TUSCOLA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS—2001. Norma Bates, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Tuscola County Apportionment Commission, Respondent-Appellee.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

April 25, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nantz, Litowich, Smith & Girard, P.C. (by John H. Gretzinger), Grand Rapids, MI, for the petitioner-appellant.

Mark E. Reene, Prosecuting Attorney, Caro, MI, for the respondent-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Following the 2000 census, the Tuscola County Apportionment Commission reapportioned the districts for the Tuscola County Board of Commissioners under M.C.L. § 46.401 et seq. In this action, the petitioner raised several challenges to the apportionment commission's actions. The Court of Appeals upheld the apportionment plan, and the petitioner seeks leave to appeal. We conclude that a districting plan meets constitutional population standards...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases