HINER v. CRAWFORD HEALTH & REHABILITATION

00-00492; A113029.

54 P.3d 633 (2002)

183 Or.App. 640

In the Matter of the Compensation of Lisa A. Hiner, Claimant. Lisa A. HINER, Petitioner, v. CRAWFORD HEALTH & REHABILITATION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 25, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James L. Edmunson, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Cole, Cary, Wing & Bloom, P.C.

Kevin L. Mannix, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Jenny Ogawa and Kevin L. Mannix, P.C.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and WARREN, Senior Judge.


WOLLHEIM, J.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board order, contending that the board erred in holding that the 1997 amendments to ORS 656.262(7)(c) did not require a reopening of an originally nondisabling claim for the processing of new medical conditions. We review for errors of law, ORS 183.482(8), and reverse and remand.

In September 1990, claimant was injured in an automobile accident while working for employer. Employer accepted a nondisabling...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases