1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 237 F.Supp.2d
  5. 237 F.Supp.2d 450 (2002)
 

BERRY v. KERIK

No. 00 CIV.2834.

237 F.Supp.2d 450 (2002)

Joseph BERRY, Plaintiff, v. Bernard B. KERIK, et al, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

November 27, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Berry, Attica, NY, Pro se.

Michael D. Hess, Esq., Daniel R. Ryan, Esq., Corporation Counsel of the City of NY, New York City, for Defendants.

ORDER

BERMAN, District Judge.

I. Background

On July 17, 2002, this Court adopted the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge James C. Francis, IV, dated June 11, 2002, and granted the "City Defendants'" and the "St. Barnabas Defendants'" (collectively, "Defendants") motions to dismiss Berry v. Kerik, et al, No. 00 Civ. 2834 and Berry v. Kerik, et al, No. 00 Civ. 3726 with prejudice due to pro se Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases