The record supports respondents' finding that one of the petitioner's meters did not give accurate readings between January 1994 and April 1996 and, therefore, respondents' decision to bill petitioner based on estimated consumption using representative average daily flows was rationally based and was not arbitrary and capricious and, accordingly, may not be judicially disturbed (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF MID-CITY ASSOCIATES v. NEW YORK CITY WATER BOARD
290 A.D.2d 392 (2002)
739 N.Y.S.2d 1
In the Matter of MID-CITY ASSOCIATES, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY WATER BOARD et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 31, 2002.
Decided January 31, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.