BATES v. BAEZ


299 A.D.2d 382 (2002)

749 N.Y.S.2d 424

WILLIAM BATES et al., Respondents, v. CHRISTOPHER BAEZ et al., Appellants, and 85 THEODOR FREMD AVENUE CORP., Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided November 12, 2002.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

To invoke the drastic remedy of striking a pleading, the Supreme Court must determine that the party's failure to comply with a disclosure order was the result of willful, deliberate, and contumacious conduct or its equivalent. The willful and contumacious character of a party's conduct can be inferred from his or her repeated failures to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases