Petitioner's motion to vacate respondent's mechanic's lien upon the ground that the lien had not been timely filed, was properly denied since issues of fact exist as to whether work performed at the subject premises within the statutory eight-month period was performed pursuant to the parties' contract, or constituted warranty or repair work, or new work outside the parties' contract (see, Lien Law § 10 [1]; Nelson v Schrank, 273 App Div 72; J. Adelman...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
