Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The hearing evidence established that the photo identification was confirmatory and was free from the risk of misidentification through suggestion. The evidence warranted the conclusion that the victim knew defendant for nearly a month through daily, extensive contact as a fellow inmate housed in the same unit (see, People v Tas,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.