Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's claims that the prosecutor improperly used a witness's prior grand jury testimony to refresh his recollection, and that the trial court erred in instructing the jury that it could consider such testimony for credibility purposes, are unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the prosecutor properly used the witness's grand jury testimony to refresh his recollection (see
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.