IQ PRODUCTS CO. v. PENNZOIL PRODUCTS CO.

No. 01-20764.

305 F.3d 368 (2002)

IQ PRODUCTS COMPANY, Plaintiff-Intervenor Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellant, v. PENNZOIL PRODUCTS COMPANY, Intervenor Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee, v. Pandora Manufacturing Incorporated, also known as Snap Products, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

September 23, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth M. Morris (argued), Morris & Campbell, David Allen Furlow, Thompson & Knight, Houston, TX, for IQ Products Co.

George T. Shipley (argued), Michael P. Lennon, Michael B. Bennett, David Keith Isaak, Baker Botts, Houston, TX, for Pennzoil Products Co.

Charles R. Gregg (argued), Houston, TX, M. Wade Turner, David Earl Harrell, Jr., Locke Liddell & Sapp, Houston, TX, for Pandora Mfg., Inc.

Before DAVIS, DeMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges.


W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff IQ Products Co. brought suit against defendants Pandora Manufacturing, Inc. (formerly known as Snap Products, Inc.) and Pennzoil Products Co., alleging that defendants falsely advertised their competing tire inflator product, Fix-A-Flat, in violation of the Lanham Act. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants. For the reasons given below, we affirm.

I.

This case involves competing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases