Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court correctly determined that the statements made to the police emergency telephone operator at approximately 4:07 A.M. on the night in question did not qualify as present sense impressions since they were not sufficiently corroborated by other independent evidence (see People v Vasquez,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.