1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 56 P.3d
  5. 56 P.3d 613 (2002)
 

STATE v. SUTHERLAND

No. 49830-4-I.

56 P.3d 613 (2002)

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Randall SUTHERLAND, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

October 28, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Kummerow, Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

David W. Gross, King County Prosecutor's Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

COX, A.C.J.

Randall Sutherland appeals, arguing there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for felony violation of a no-contact order. Specifically, he argues that the State relied on an invalid order to prove the offense. The warning in the order that any violation would be a crime incorrectly cited Chapter 10.99 RCW, not Chapter 26.50 RCW, the correct statutory reference. Because Sutherland fails to show how...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases