Ordered that the corrected order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We disagree with the appellant's contention that the Family Court improperly exercised its discretion in ordering a six-month placement in a limited secure facility. The Family Court has broad discretion in entering dispositional orders (see Family Ct Act § 141) and it is well settled that "`[t]he least restrictive alternative test does not require the court to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
