Defendant admits that he never objected to plaintiff's detailed monthly bills, and his claim that the bills were padded by various fraudulent billing practices, including rounding up to the nearest 15-minute interval and reallocating administrative time as billable time, lacks evidentiary support, and indeed was largely refuted by his own witness, a former employee of plaintiff and defendant's present accountant. Accordingly, plaintiff is entitled to judgment on the theory...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
