1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 295 A.D.2d
  5. 295 A.D.2d 364 (2002)
 

PEOPLE v. HALLINGQUEST

295 A.D.2d 364 (2002)

742 N.Y.S.2d 919

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD HALLINGQUEST, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided June 3, 2002.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's challenge to the trial court's Sandoval ruling (see People v Sandoval, 34 N.Y.2d 371) is without merit. The trial court providently exercised its discretion in permitting inquiry into two of the defendants' 12 prior convictions, and in allowing questioning as to the underlying facts of those two convictions. The trial court's ruling struck an appropriate balance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases