Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. None of defendant's statements was the product of unnecessary delay in his arraignment on an unrelated drug possession charge. Delay in arraignment may be justified by the need to investigate additional charges (People v Hopkins,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. PERCIBALLI
291 A.D.2d 360 (2002)
738 N.Y.S.2d 343
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DOMINIC PERCIBALLI, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 28, 2002.
Decided February 28, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.