The gist of the court's instruction to each of the jurors who asked to speak to the judge and asked for information was simply a reminder that all inquiries on the law and the evidence must be in writing. These reminders were not supplemental instructions, but rather were ministerial directives which did not require defendant's presence (People v Herrmann,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. ARTWELL
290 A.D.2d 361 (2002)
736 N.Y.S.2d 591
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FENTON ARTWELL, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 24, 2002.
Decided January 24, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.