HOLLOMON v. O. MUSTAD & SONS (USA), INC.

No. Civ.A. 1:00-CV-298.

196 F.Supp.2d 450 (2002)

Michael E. HOLLOMON, Plaintiff, v. O. MUSTAD & SONS (USA), INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division.

March 22, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl A. Parker, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, Edward W. Goldstein, John T. Polasek, Goldstein & Healey, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff.

Gregory M. Hasley, John Francis Luman, III, Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, Houton, TX, J. Thad Heartfield, Jr., Heartfield & McGinnis, Beaumont, TX, for Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

COBB, District Judge.

Before the court is Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. # 57], and the court having reviewed the motion and responses on file and having heard oral arguments on said motion is of the opinion that the motion be GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART.

This is a fish hook case. The parties entered into two agreements regarding the manufacture and sale of hooks designed by the plaintiff. After several years...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases