The motion court properly dismissed plaintiff patient's direct claim for her own injury in light of plaintiffs' silence in the face of defendants' assertion that the patient was not pressing such claim. Notably, plaintiffs' brief does not address the propriety of this ruling. Dismissal of the patient's direct claim mandates dismissal of her husband's derivative cause of action (see, Balestrero v Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 283 App Div 794, affd
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
CAMADEO v. LEEDS M.D.
290 A.D.2d 355 (2002)
736 N.Y.S.2d 368
ANJANIE CAMADEO et al., Appellants, v. GARY LEEDS, M.D., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 24, 2002.
Decided January 24, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
