Defendant, as an out-of-possession landlord, could not be held liable under the circumstances, since there is no indication that it had notice of the alleged hazard, a defectively secured drain hole cover, and the relevant lease provision plainly demonstrates that the parties to the lease intended that the tenant would be responsible for routinely maintaining the "good order and condition" of fixtures such as the drain hole cover (see, Velazquez v Tyler Graphics, ...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
