The court properly exercised its discretion in admitting evidence of defendant's unprovoked attack on another resident at the shelter where he and the complainant resided. Such evidence was relevant to complete the narrative and to explain why shelter employees would have remembered this particular defendant from among the hundreds of residents at the shelter. Under the circumstances of this case, their ability to remember defendant was relevant, not only to identity, but...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
