CARBAJAL v. BOBO ROBO, INC.


300 A.D.2d 335 (2002)

750 N.Y.S.2d 791

IVAN CARBAJAL, Appellant, v. BOBO ROBO, INC., Doing Business as REGENTS, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided December 9, 2002.


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, the order dated January 22, 2002, is reinstated, and the Clerk of the Supreme Court, New York County, is directed to transfer the file of the action to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County.

The respondents asserted no new or newly-discovered facts on their motion. Accordingly, the motion is properly denominated a motion for reargument (see Granato v Waldbaum's Inc.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases