The motion was properly granted in the absence of any evidence that defendant either created or had actual or constructive notice of the wet spot which allegedly caused plaintiff's harm (see, Segretti v Shorenstein Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SFERRAZZA v. ARCADE CLEANING CONTRACTORS, INC.
296 A.D.2d 338 (2002)
744 N.Y.S.2d 673
PATRICIA SFERRAZZA et al., Appellants, v. ARCADE CLEANING CONTRACTORS, INC., Also Known as ARCADE MAINTENANCE, et al., Respondents. (And Other Actions.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided July 11, 2002.
Decided July 11, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.