The Supreme Court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs and Campos as material issues of fact exist, inter alia, regarding the proximate cause of plaintiff Harold Thompson's injury (see, CPLR 3212) and whether, Campos, as contract vendee, acted as an agent of the general contractor and owner Mid-Westchester (see, Mordkofsky v V.C.V. Dev. Corp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
THOMPSON v. MID-WEST-CHESTER CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC.
290 A.D.2d 341 (2002)
736 N.Y.S.2d 225
HAROLD THOMPSON et al., Respondents, v. MID-WEST-CHESTER CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC., Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, and ANDREW CAMPOS, Respondent. ANDREW CAMPOS et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 24, 2002.
Decided January 24, 2002.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.