The judgment is based on the jury's answers to interrogatories that the trial court construed to be in favor of the licensor but are irreconcilably inconsistent. In interrogatory one, the jury answered that the licensor did not breach the license agreement, and in interrogatory two answered that the licensor breached the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The answers cannot be reconciled in view of the court's charge (see Brewster v Prince Apts.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
BOSCORALE OPERATING, LLC v. NAUTICA APPAREL, INC.
298 A.D.2d 330 (2002)
749 N.Y.S.2d 233
BOSCORALE OPERATING, LLC, Appellant, v. NAUTICA APPAREL, INC., Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 31, 2002.
Decided October 31, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
