SIDDEN v. MAILMAN

No. COA01-63.

563 S.E.2d 55 (2002)

Judy Ann SIDDEN, Plaintiff v. Richard Bernard MAILMAN, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 21, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sheridan & Steffan, P.C. by Mark T. Sheridan, Hillsborough, for plaintiff-appellant.

The Brough Law Firm by G. Nicholas Herman, Chapel Hill, for defendant-appellee.


CAMPBELL, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals a supplemental order affirming a separation and property settlement agreement between plaintiff and defendant based on plaintiff's failure to present facts supporting her entitlement to relief under the theory of breach of fiduciary duty. We affirm.

A full statement of the facts is set forth in this Court's earlier opinion of Sidden v. Mailman, 137 N.C. App. 669, 529 S.E.2d 266 ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases