Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The hearing record establishes that on each occasion that defendant made statements prior to the administration of Miranda warnings, a reasonable person in defendant's situation would have considered himself free to leave (see, People v Yukl,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. PEREZ
291 A.D.2d 326 (2002)
738 N.Y.S.2d 331
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARDO PEREZ, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 26, 2002.
Decided February 26, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.