The IAS court, after thorough consideration of the parties' arguments, properly rejected their respective challenges to the Special Referee's reports, holding that the disputed findings of the Special Referee were amply supported by the extensive record made before him. Accordingly, we perceive no basis for disturbing them (see Matter of Hirschfeld, Stern, Moyer & Ross,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF WILLIAMSON
298 A.D.2d 314 (2002)
748 N.Y.S.2d 500
In the Matter of PAUL G. WILLIAMSON, Appellant-Respondent. WILLIAMSON, PICKET, GROSS, INC., Respondent-Appellant. In the Matter of PAUL G. WILLIAMSON, Appellant-Respondent. WPG ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., Respondents-Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 29, 2002.
Decided October 29, 2002.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.