PEOPLE v. FROST


293 A.D.2d 319 (2002)

739 N.Y.S.2d 818

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THEO FROST, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided April 11, 2002.


After balancing all of the relevant factors (see, People v Taranovich, 37 N.Y.2d 442), we conclude that defendant's constitutional speedy trial motion was properly denied. Most of the 37½ month delay was attributable to defendant, including a period in which defendant absconded, and there has been no showing of prejudice. The fact that the original indictment was defective and had to be superseded caused only a short period...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases