The court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress the undercover officer's identification of defendant as fruit of an unlawful seizure. The hearing evidence established that the undercover officer observed a hand-to-hand drug transaction between the defendant and a male and female. Thereafter, he radioed a description of all three participants. Minutes later, the arresting officer saw defendant, who was the only person present who fit the undercover officer's description...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
