Defendant's investigation of plaintiff's claims of harassing phone calls involved an exercise of discretion for which defendant cannot be held liable in negligence absent an allegation that any of the police officers with whom plaintiff spoke specifically promised to perform a particular act on her behalf (see, Cuffy v City of New York,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF BURTIS v. NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
294 A.D.2d 315 (2002)
742 N.Y.S.2d 545
In the Matter of FARIDA BURTIS, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 30, 2002.
Decided May 30, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.