The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. The evidence warranted the conclusion that defendant filed her "zero return" tax returns, seeking refunds for all the taxes she paid, without a good-faith belief in the bizarre theories underlying her claim for refunds. The question of whether defendant had such a good-faith belief was one to be resolved by the jury (see Cheek v United States,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.