MA'ELE v. ARRINGTON

No. 25015-2-II.

45 P.3d 557 (2002)

Duke MA'ELE, Appellant, v. Florine ARRINGTON and John Doe Arrington, wife and husband, and their marital community composed thereof, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

Publication Ordered May 3, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick Arthur Palace, Tacoma, for Appellant.

Elizabeth Ann Jensen, Richard J. Jensen Ps & Associates, Tacoma, for Respondents.


ARMSTRONG, C.J.

The trial court found Florine Arrington solely at fault for a car accident she had with Duke Ma'ele. Several chiropractic doctors testified that the accident injured Ma'ele. But a biomechanical engineer said that he would not expect a person to be injured in such a low energy collision. The jury found that the accident did not proximately cause Ma'ele's injuries and awarded no damages. On appeal, Ma'ele argues...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases