1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 306 F.3d
  5. 306 F.3d 295 (2002)
 

U.S. v. STEWART

Nos. 99-5615, 99-5850, 99-5852, 99-5853, 99-6248, and 99-6249.

306 F.3d 295 (2002)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Suzette Miranda STEWART (99-5615); Calvin Nelson Tramble (99-5850); Charles Rossell, also known as Dog, also known as Snoopy (99-5852); Timothy Demarcus Lanxter, also known as Little Man (99-5853); Nathan Benford, also known as Fred, also known as Nate (99-6248); Rena Yvonne Benford, also known as Yvonne Redding, also known as Granny, also known as Renee Redding, also known as Rena Redding, also known as Rena Benford (99-6249), Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Submitted: July 31, 2001.

Decided and Filed: September 10, 2002.

Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing Denied: November 13, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregg L. Sullivan (argued and briefed), Assistant United States Attorney, Chattanooga, TN, for U.S.

Clayton M. Whittaker (argued and briefed), Foster, Foster, Allen & Durrence, Chattanooga, TN, for Suzette Miranda Stewart.

Suzette Miranda Stewart, Tallahassee, FL, pro se.

Neal L. Thompson (argued and briefed), Chattanooga, TN, for Calvin Nelson Tramble.

Jerry H. Summers (briefed), Jimmy F. Rodgers, Jr. (argued and briefed), Summers & Wyatt, Chattanooga, TN, for Charles Rossell.

Paul D. Cross (briefed), Monteagle, TN, for Timothy Demarcus Lanxter.

William H. Ortwein (argued and briefed), Ortwein & Associates, Chattanooga, TN, for Nathan Benford.

W. Gerald Tidwell, Jr. (briefed), Chattanooga, TN, for Rena Yvonne Benford.

Before CLAY, GILMAN, and WALLACE, Circuit Judges.

Argued 99-5615, 99-5850, 99-5852, 99-6248: July 31, 2001.

Submitted 99-5853, 99-6249: July 31, 2001.

Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied: November 13, 2002.

AMENDED OPINION

CLAY, Circuit Judge.

This consolidated case, involving six members of a drug trafficking conspiracy in Chattanooga, Tennessee, presents several issues for consideration. The Defendants appeal their judgments after being convicted, inter alia...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases