1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 298 A.D.2d
  5. 298 A.D.2d 301 (2002)
 

EDELMAN v. TAITTINGER, S.A.

298 A.D.2d 301 (2002)

751 N.Y.S.2d 171

ASHER B. EDELMAN et al., Appellants, v. TAITTINGER, S.A., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided October 29, 2002.

Contrary to the determination of the motion court, we find that plaintiffs made a "sufficient start" (see Peterson v Spartan Indus., 33 N.Y.2d 463, 467) in demonstrating that defendants Taittinger, S.A. and Compagne Financiere Taittinger were doing business in New York through their direct or indirect subsidiaries and thus "present" in the jurisdiction so as to furnish a jurisdictional predicate pursuant to CPLR 301. While a showing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases