Since defendant did not move to withdraw his plea, his claim that the court should have made an inquiry into his remark at sentencing that the plea was against his will is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the court was not obligated to conduct a sua sponte inquiry. Nothing in defendant's plea allocution cast doubt on his guilt (see People v Toxey,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. HARRIS
299 A.D.2d 298 (2002)
749 N.Y.S.2d 725
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DERRICK HARRIS, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided November 26, 2002.
Decided November 26, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.