1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 291 A.D.2d
  5. 291 A.D.2d 305 (2002)
 

CRAWFORD v. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP.

291 A.D.2d 305 (2002)

737 N.Y.S.2d 844

TERRELL CRAWFORD, Respondent, v. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP. et al., Defendants, A AND K TAXI CORP. et al., Appellants, and AMELIA R. QUEROL, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided February 21, 2002.

Having already reinstated the answer of defendant-respondent Querol (283 A.D.2d 184), struck in the same motion presently under review, we reinstate the answer of defendants-appellants herein on the basis of the same reasoning and conditions set forth in our prior order. If defendant fails to appear for a deposition within the time frame set by the motion court, a sufficient sanction would be to preclude the use of Kilic's testimony...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases