PEOPLE v. BRUNO


290 A.D.2d 306 (2002)

735 N.Y.S.2d 774

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NAIM BRUNO, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided January 15, 2002.


Defendant's motions to suppress an oral statement and two written confessions made to the police were properly denied. All three statements were preceded by proper Miranda warnings and waivers. The brief interval between the warnings and the oral statement did not require renewed warnings (People v Irizarry, 199 A.D.2d 180, lv denied 83 N.Y.2d 872). Under the totality of circumstances (see, Arizona v Fulminante,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases