There is no reasonable possibility that the court's carefully phrased responses to inquiries from a panelist during jury selection could have conveyed to the jury that defendant had a prior record or otherwise caused any prejudice. Defendant did not preserve his current claim of error regarding the court's preliminary instructions to the jury to draw no adverse inference if he chose not to testify and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
