Defendant's motion to suppress his statements to the police was properly denied. The record supports the hearing court's finding that defendant was not subjected to interrogation requiring Miranda warnings when the officer asked him a single clarifying question, unrelated to the charge for which defendant had been arrested, concerning the ownership of a credit card in his possession bearing a name other than the one he gave at his arrest (see People v Huffman,<...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
