1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 82 S.W.3d
  5. 82 S.W.3d 501 (2002)
 

WALLACE v. RAMON

No. 04-01-00461-CV.

82 S.W.3d 501 (2002)

Holden WALLACE and Holden Wallace, Inc., Appellants, v. Ralph RAMON and Diana Ramon, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio.

May 1, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Adam Poncio, Valerie L. Mawi, Cerda & Poncio, P.C., San Antonio, for Appellant.

Rogelio F. Munoz, Uvalde, for Appellee.

Sitting: ALMA L. LÓPEZ, Justice, SARAH B. DUNCAN, Justice, KAREN ANGELINI, Justice.

Opinion by: SARAH B. DUNCAN, Justice.

Holden Wallace and Holden Wallace, Inc. contend there is legally and factually insufficient evidence to support the trial court's post-answer default judgment. We agree that there is legally insufficient evidence to support the judgment against Holden Wallace individually and therefore reverse this aspect of the trial court's judgment and render judgment in his favor. We further agree...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases