1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 348 S.C.
  5. 348 S.C. 235 (2002)
 

IN RE TULLIS

No. 25413.

348 S.C. 235 (2002)

559 S.E.2d 833

In the Matter of Rodman C. TULLIS, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided February 11, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Attorney General Charles M. Condon and Senior Assistant Attorney General James G. Bogle, Jr., both of Columbia, for Office of Disciplinary Counsel, for petitioner.

Rodman C. Tullis, of Spartanburg, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Formal charges were filed against Rodman C. Tullis ("Respondent") on July 11, 2000.1 Respondent failed to respond to the charges and an Affidavit of Default was filed on September 12, 2000. Therefore, under Rule 24 of Rule 413, SCACR, the charges were deemed admitted. The following charges were filed against Respondent.

I. Failure to Respond to Disciplinary Charges

On September 15, 1999, the Commission...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases